Composite story
Trump says he approved lower fuel-economy standards that end a Biden EV push
Washington, District of ColumbiaPublished 27 Sep 2026
U.S. Department of Transportation / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain · source
The president said Saturday he signed off on new mileage rules the Transportation Department plans to unveil Monday, cutting the 2031 target well below the Biden-era standard.
On Sept. 26, 2026, President Donald Trump said he approved new fuel-economy standards that he said would terminate what he calls the Biden administration's electric-vehicle mandate and lower new-car prices. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the rules would be announced Monday. A December proposal would set a fleetwide average of 34.5 miles per gallon by 2031, down from 50.4 under Biden, and the department estimated that path would raise fuel use and emissions while cutting sticker prices.
Trump says he is rolling back Biden-era US fuel economy rules for cars
Published 26 Sep 2026 accessed 27 Sep 2026
Facts
Under CAFE, a brand that sells an inefficient vehicle must also sell a more efficient one.
Automakers have increased electric-vehicle production to help meet the Biden fuel-economy requirements.
Opinion
Trump accused the Biden administration of imposing costly requirements on carmakers and steering consumers toward electric vehicles.
Al Jazeera said the rollback increases the gap between US policy and global trends favoring electric vehicles.
Trump says he approved new fuel economy standards, rolling back Biden-era rules
Published 26 Sep 2026 accessed 27 Sep 2026
Facts
Trump presented the policy change as a boon for automakers and consumers.
The change would fulfill a Trump campaign promise to rescind policies that encouraged or incentivized electric vehicles.
General Motors has said it will still make electric vehicles.
Opinion
CNBC said weaker fuel-economy standards mean automakers can produce more pickup trucks and SUVs, which are more profitable than smaller cars but get worse gas mileage.
CNBC said electric vehicles also become much less attractive to automakers.
Trump says he approved new fuel economy standards ending Biden-era electric vehicle mandate
Published 26 Sep 2026 accessed 27 Sep 2026
Facts
Trump wrote that billions were wasted on chargers that were never built.
Trump said his administration is investing $100 billion in American autos.
Joe Biden's EPA issued stricter fuel-emissions standards in 2024 that would require automakers to build more electric vehicles.
Jim Farley said Ford will be able to offer more affordability on popular models and launch new vehicles built in America because of the rule change.
Trump said officials approved a plan to impose a 100 percent ban on all new gas-powered cars in a short time.
Trump said you can't buy any car except an electric-powered car.
Trump said California has blackouts and brownouts.
Trump said California does not have enough electricity right now.
Opinion
Trump wrote that Democrats cost automakers billions and forced Americans into cars they never wanted.
Ford CEO Jim Farley called Trump's plan to lower fuel standards a victory for affordability and common sense.
Trump said the previous administration gave left-wing radicals in California dictatorial power over the car industry.
Trump said his signature will kill the California mandates forever.
Trump called Gavin Newsom's plan ridiculous and mocked him as Newscum.
Trump approves new fuel economy rules, says car prices will fall
Published 26 Sep 2026 accessed 27 Sep 2026
Facts
Trump wrote that the previous standards increased costs for automakers and consumers.
Atid Kimelman said Americans are struggling to afford gasoline that is more than $4 a gallon.
Sean Duffy did not specify whether that post referred to the fuel-economy standards Donald Trump cited.
Trump said the standards would make it easier for automakers to build vehicles consumers want to buy.
It was not immediately clear whether the standards Trump referenced Saturday match that proposal or contain additional changes.
Sean Duffy claimed the Biden administration illegally counted electric-vehicle adoption rates and compliance credits when setting maximum feasible fuel economy under the 1975 law.
NHTSA has argued that prior fuel-economy standards relied too heavily on projected electric-vehicle adoption and compliance credits.
NHTSA estimated that its earlier proposal would cut the average upfront cost of a new vehicle by about $930.
NHTSA says that interpretation conflicts with federal law.
NHTSA projected the proposal would increase fuel consumption by roughly 100 billion gallons through 2050.
Supporters of the Biden-era standards argued they would reduce oil consumption and help limit transportation-sector emissions.
In June 2025 Sean Duffy published a rule titled Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program.
NHTSA projected the proposal would add about $185 billion in fuel spending.
NHTSA projected the proposal would increase carbon dioxide emissions by about 5 percent.
Supporters of the proposed rollback argue it could lower vehicle prices and reduce compliance costs for automakers.
Sean Duffy said the Freedom Means Affordable Cars proposal is projected to save Americans $109 billion over five years.
Sean Duffy said the proposal would save families $1,000 on the average cost of a new vehicle.
That move has sparked legal challenges and debate over California's regulatory authority.
Opinion
Atid Kimelman said the Trump administration is going to force drivers to pay more at the pump.
Atid Kimelman said oil companies will get a windfall from gutting the fuel-economy standards while everyone else pays more to fill the tank.
Sean Duffy said the administration wanted automakers to focus on vehicles consumers want rather than vehicles favored by federal policymakers.
Trump Says He Has Reversed Biden-Era Fuel Efficiency Standards
Published 26 Sep 2026 accessed 27 Sep 2026
Facts
The government's analysis of the proposed rule says the move could lead to drivers paying hundreds more for gas each year.
That analysis says the move could worsen the country's ability to weather oil-price shocks.
The federal government first regulated miles per gallon in the 1970s, amid high gasoline prices, blocked oil supplies, and U.S. conflict in the Middle East, conditions The Washington Sun likens to 2026.
The government then required cars to go farther on less gas to protect consumers from unstable energy markets.
34.5 miles per gallon is lower than the average fuel economy of the existing U.S. fleet as of 2024.
Fuel standards generally require manufacturers to make their whole fleet, on average, more efficient each year.
The war in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have shown how geopolitical turmoil can hit American drivers.
Pete Buttigieg said U.S. manufacturing jobs are down under Trump, including in the auto industry.
As proposed, the Trump standards do not consider electric vehicles or plug-in hybrids, which brings the average fuel-economy goals down.
Trump signed legislation that set penalties for violating fuel-efficiency standards to zero.
Dave Cooke said CAFE standards have saved drivers over $300 billion in fuel costs since a revision under the Obama administration.
Trump eliminated the 2009 endangerment finding that underpinned vehicle emissions standards.
Congress and President Gerald Ford created the first CAFE standards about 50 years ago in response to the 1973 oil embargo.
The goal was to lessen the country's dependence on foreign fuel as gas prices soared.
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg responded to Trump's post reversing the Biden-era standards.
Over 50 years, CAFE standards more than doubled the average miles per gallon of cars, trucks, and other light vehicles.
NHTSA's analysis shows drivers spending up to $1,400 more on gas.
The White House says the Biden-era standards would have raised the cost of a new car by nearly $1,000.
Automakers and federal officials have argued that the current CAFE standards are too hard to achieve.
NHTSA's analysis shows thousands of auto-industry jobs disappearing.
Automakers and federal officials argued that the Biden administration relied too much on electric vehicles to raise fleet fuel efficiency.
Americans have continued to buy electric vehicles, but at a slower pace.
NHTSA officials said requiring big fuel-economy gains has distracted automakers and shifted resources away from safety.
Sales of fully electric cars have dropped since the tax credits disappeared.
Federal officials excluded electric vehicles from the model used to analyze the revised CAFE proposal.
Hybrid sales continue to climb.
The administration's analysis shows energy-security benefits from using less fuel decrease as cars become less efficient.
Risks to the U.S. economy from global oil-market shocks increase.
The official analysis says traffic fatalities and property damage from crashes would drop.
The analysis says health harms from higher emissions, including ER visits, worse asthma, heart attacks, and premature deaths, would increase.
In another model that includes electric vehicles, the same trends apply.
The analysis says that drop happens because people drive less when they get fewer miles per gallon.
Opinion
Sean Duffy has argued the previous CAFE standards amounted to a mandate for automakers to produce electric vehicles.
The Washington Sun said that justification defies the government's own research and undercuts the history of the regulation.
Pete Buttigieg said lowering the standards will hand the clean-tech future to China and force Americans to pay more at the pump.
Sean Duffy said changing the rules will let companies produce cars that are more affordable and safer.
Pete Buttigieg said Trump's strategy failed and that this standards change will too.
Dave Cooke said the country is reliving exactly the moment the fuel-economy standards were designed for.
Dave Cooke said the proposal only looks at the worst-performing vehicles and how much those can improve.
The Washington Sun said the overhaul culminates the administration's push to undo Biden-era support for a shift to electric vehicles.
The Washington Sun said that exclusion means the analysis is not reflective of real-world conditions.
