Spunzo

The Un-Spun Zone.

Composite story

Judge vacates Education Department cuts to DEI-linked teacher-training grants

The U.S. Department of Education building in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Department of Education building in Washington, D.C.

G. Edward Johnson / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0 · source

U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley struck down a February 2025 directive that canceled hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-preparation grants. The ruling does not restore the money.

On Sept. 17, 2026, Judge Angel Kelley in Boston vacated the Education Department’s February 2025 order terminating Teacher Quality Partnership and SEED grants the administration tied to DEI. Kelley found the directive arbitrary and capricious. Eight Democratic-led states had sued after about $600 million in awards were cut. The Supreme Court in 2025 had allowed the terminations to proceed while the case continued. Recovery of the funds, Kelley said, belongs in the Court of Federal Claims.

Shared facts

In February 2025 the Education Department cut about $600 million in teacher-training grants.

The grants were issued through the Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator Development programs.

The department said the grants funded training on divisive ideologies, including DEI and social-justice activism.

Eight Democratic-led states sued over the cuts.

A federal judge in Boston previously temporarily halted the cuts.

In April 2025 the Supreme Court allowed the government to cut the grants while the case proceeded.

U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley on Thursday struck down the Education Department directive that terminated the teacher-training grants.

Kelley found the directive arbitrary and capricious and not in accordance with federal law.

Kelley said the department failed to account for how much states, students, teachers, and principals rely on the grants.

Kelley said lawsuits seeking to recover the lost funds must proceed in the Court of Federal Claims.

Associated Press

Judge strikes down Trump policy that cut millions in teacher-training money

Associated Press

Published 17 Sep 2026 accessed 18 Sep 2026

Facts

The grants were intended to address teacher shortages.

Kelley's ruling does not restore the grant money.

Kelley wrote that the Education Department's order was hasty.

The directive affected more than 100 programs.

The federal appeals court in Boston turned away an administration appeal seeking to let the cuts resume.

The Supreme Court's conservative majority wrote that states could keep the programs running with their own money for now.

The states argued the grants help develop teachers in math, science, and special education.

The states argued data has shown the grants help boost teacher retention beyond five years.

Opinion

No opinion marked.

The Hill

Judge blocks Education Dept teacher training funding cuts over DEI, anti-racism

Lexi Lonas Cochran

Published 18 Sep 2026 accessed 18 Sep 2026

Facts

Kelley wrote that the department terminated grants with topics such as acknowledging racism and anti-racism.

Kelley cited the department's failure to explain the switch from grants that previously encouraged DEI programs.

Kelley wrote that those activities were expressly undertaken to oppose discrimination.

Kelley also objected to the directive because of its impact on teacher preparation.

In 2025 the Education Department said the funding cuts were directed at programs focused on critical race theory, DEI, social justice, anti-racism, white privilege, and white supremacy.

One grant application the department objected to required practitioners to take personal and institutional responsibility for systemic inequities such as racism.

Opinion

The Hill said the department cut grants it did not like.

Reuters

US judge strikes down Education Department's anti-DEI grant policy

Nate Raymond

Published 17 Sep 2026 accessed 18 Sep 2026

Facts

Kelley said the policy provided no discernible criteria for which programs would be considered DEI and disfavored for funding.

Kelley wrote that the directive does not acknowledge that thousands of teachers and people in teacher-training pipelines would be affected, upending careers of needed educators.

Over 90 percent of grants in those programs were canceled as a result of the directive to terminate ones supporting DEI.

The 109 terminated grants included 40 awarded to universities and other institutions in the eight states.

The 6-3 conservative-majority Supreme Court put that reinstatement order on hold.

The states were led by California, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.

Kelley said she retained the ability to determine whether the original February 2025 directive complied with the Administrative Procedure Act.

Kelley was appointed by President Joe Biden.

Opinion

No opinion marked.